Airframe differences between L235 and L320?

Submitted by Anonymous on Sat, 12/19/1998 - 14:42

Forums:

LML Archive

From:	Thistedby way of Marvin Kaye <marvkaye [at] olsusa.com> <thisted [at] csi.com>
Subject:	Airframe differences between L235 and L320?
Date:	Sat, 19 Dec 1998 09:42:46 -0500
To:	<lancair.list [at] olsusa.com>

<x-rich> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Bo Thisted wrote: I am looking at purchasing an already built lancair 235, 320 or 360. I found a 235 with an O-320 installed. Does this make it a 320 (more or less), or is there other significant differences between the two models? </x-rich>

Submitted by Anonymous on Sat, 12/19/1998 - 19:14

From:	John Cooper <heyduke [at] digital.net>
Subject:	Airframe differences between L235 and L320?
Date:	Sat, 19 Dec 1998 14:14:00 -0500
To:	<lancair.list [at] olsusa.com>

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> The 320 airframe is 8" longer, 4" higher in the canopy area, and has a bigger instrument panel than the 235. The wings are the same. Don Goetz at Neico was the first to install an O-320 engine in a 235 airframe. Call him if you want more details.