Submitted by Anonymous on Mon, 12/14/1998 - 01:47 Forums: LML Archive From: Peter Van Arsdale <phva [at] mediaone.net> Subject: Continental 550 Engines Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 20:47:30 -0500 To: <lancair.list [at] olsusa.com> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I've been a Lancair IV wanabee for a number of years and when I finally get around to it, the feedback from LML is going to be invaluable. I really enjoy the discussions and feedback. I have been really surprised to learn about short engine life with the Continental 550 engine. At my old company, we operated a fleet of 53 Cessna 402's and had nothing but good experience with the TSIO 550 VB engine. We had an approved TBO of 2600 hours and it was rare that an engine did not make that time with no cylinder problems whatsoever. Every now and then we would have a case crack. Oil changes were performed at 50 hours. Much of the flying was done into airprorts with TCA's requiring relatively rapid decents and deceleration. The average trip length was about 35 minutes so a lot of takeoffs were made. Power settings were changed very slowly and engines leaned in cruise, but to a very rich setting. The engines were far more reliable than PT-6's operated on 20+ turboprop planes. I will contact friends I have at Cape Air which operates a large fleet of 402's and see what they get for time and what sort of procedures are used. The information may be useful. Granted the L-IV is operating in a different environment, but it hard to believe some owners are only getting 400 hours. Peter Van Arsdale