Well, that's confusing...

Submitted by Anonymous on

Forums: 

From: Mark Sletten <mwsletten [at] gmail.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Well, that's confusing...
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 18:54:30 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Well, that's confusing...

Submitted by Anonymous on

From: Michael Newman <mnewman [at] dragonnorth.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Well, that's confusing...
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 07:26:23 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Message Header


Undecoded Message

Looking at source materials rather than inflammatory news may be a good idea here. As I understand it the only recent change is that the FAA issued a clarification that final assembly was to be considered an aeronautical use. The intent of this clarification was clearly to favor at least part of homebuilding use. Seeking further favorable clarification might be a better approach.

On Aug 5, 2014 6:54 PM, "Mark Sletten" <mwsletten [at] gmail.com

> wrote:

Well, that's confusing...

Submitted by Anonymous on

From: Lancair-ESP <lancair-esp [at] ustek.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Well, that's confusing...
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 07:52:17 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Message Header


Undecoded Message

That clarification might indeed help builders.  

My home airport for years restricted hanger occupants to “airworthy aircraft”. 

This definition would have given us some support to change that to “aeronautical use”
and thus permit building. 

Fortunately KDLZ now allows building on site but others still may find this useful.

 

Robert Simon

ES-P N301ES

 

From: Michael Newman [mnewman [at] dragonnorth.com]">mailto:mnewman [at] dragonnorth.com]


Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 7:26 AM

Subject: Re: [LML] Well, that's confusing...

As I understand it the only recent change is that the FAA issued a clarification that final assembly was to be considered an aeronautical use.

On Aug 5, 2014 6:54 PM, "Mark Sletten" <mwsletten [at] gmail.com

> wrote: