Cooler CHTs

Forums: 

From: William Rumburg <lancair403 [at] verizon.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Cooler CHTs
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 07:40:22 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
I maintain that the conventional baffling structure, which has a
well-executed flexible seal at the upper cowl and a form-fitting seal
at the cooling air inlets, can be almost as effective as a plenum. The
gap to the upper cowl must be uniform, not less than 3/4 inch or much
greater than 1 inch. It should, ideally, be 1 inch all around. My
Lancair-supplied baffling had too much gap at the right rear cowl, and
too little at the left rear, because the engine is slightly rotated
with respect to the cowl. In addition, a major shortcoming of the
Lancair-supplied baffling is that it leaves a WIDE gap at
the cooling air inlets, with builders doing little more than adding some
loosely-fitting, ineffective seal there. It wasn't too difficult to
correct both of these conditions and add some other enhancements, which
resulting in lowering my cruising CHT's by 40 degrees, from 360-380 to 320-340.
As seen in the photos, I added a 1 inch wide aluminum strip
across the front, easily cut from a cardboard template. That not only
transformed the baffling into a rectangular box, making it easier to
seal, but allowed for the addition of custom fiberglass seals at the air inlets.
I formed those by trimming a block of foam to the required shape and overlaying
with duct tape for release. Their circular holes match the air inlets, with
only 1/8 inch gap to the cowl. In addition, I re-cut both of baffling side
pieces to their correct heights, utilizing .050 inch thick aluminum, and made
custom 1 inch-high inner pieces -also easily cut from cardboard templates-
so as to 'sandwich' the flex seals, further decreasing air leakage. I
carefully cut all seals to the correct height and shape and feel that
I've obtained a nearly 100% seal. I also reduced airflow
wasted through engine areas other than the cylinder heads.
 
Bill Rumburg
N403WR (Sonic bOOm)
Attachment 
(1082K)


Attachment 
(1138K)


Attachment 
(1147K)


Cooler CHTs

From: Chris Zavatson <chris_zavatson [at] yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Cooler CHTs
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 07:45:06 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Bill,
Is that a new engine? -looks spotless.
Scott Krueger was also able to get a really good seal on his baffles.  In fact, he had the highest measured pressure recovery I have seen using flexible baffle material.  You wouldn't happen to have (or be interested in measuring) some upper plenum pressures for comparison?  -forever in search of cooling system data.
How do you interface to the inlets? -any pics of that area?
thanks,
Chris Zavatson
N91CZ
360std
On Monday, May 12, 2014 4:46 AM, William Rumburg <lancair403 [at] verizon.net> wrote:
I maintain that the conventional baffling structure, which has a
well-executed flexible seal at the upper cowl and a form-fitting seal
at the cooling air inlets, can be almost as effective as a plenum. The
gap to the upper cowl must be uniform, not less than 3/4 inch or much
greater than 1 inch. It should, ideally, be 1 inch all around. My
Lancair-supplied baffling had too much gap at the right rear cowl, and
too little at the left rear, because the engine is slightly rotated
with respect to the cowl. In addition, a major shortcoming of the
Lancair-supplied baffling is that it leaves a WIDE gap at
the cooling air inlets, with builders doing little more than adding some
loosely-fitting, ineffective seal there. It wasn't too difficult to
correct both of these conditions and add some other enhancements, which
resulting in lowering my cruising CHT's by 40 degrees, from 360-380 to 320-340.
As seen in the photos, I added a 1 inch wide aluminum strip
across the front, easily cut from a cardboard template. That not only
transformed the baffling into a rectangular box, making it easier to
seal, but allowed for the addition of custom fiberglass seals at the air inlets.
I formed those by trimming a block of foam to the required shape and overlaying
with duct tape for release. Their circular holes match the air inlets, with
only 1/8 inch gap to the cowl. In addition, I re-cut both of baffling side
pieces to their correct heights, utilizing .050 inch thick aluminum, and made
custom 1 inch-high inner pieces -also easily cut from cardboard templates-
so as to 'sandwich' the flex seals, further decreasing air leakage. I
carefully cut all seals to the correct height and shape and feel that
I've obtained a nearly 100% seal. I also reduced airflow
wasted through engine areas other than the cylinder heads.
 
Bill Rumburg
N403WR (Sonic bOOm)


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html


Cooler CHTs

From: William Rumburg <lancair403 [at] verizon.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Cooler CHTs
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 07:48:46 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Hi Chris - my engine was recently
overhauled, having
 fallen victim
to Lycoming's 'achilles heel' - their longstanding rubbing cam and
lifter design. At 600 hours, I found that the cam and lifters were badly
galled, with copious amounts of metal particles throughout the
engine. Frequent flying, use of oil additives, etc. are simply attempts to
stave off the real problem which is the rubbing cam and lifter design; the
solution is the new roller lifter design.
I left about 1/8" clearance between the molded
fiberglass seals and the aft side of the cowl air inlets to allow for relative
motion between the engine and cowl. Not the complete inlet seal that your plenum
design offers, but which shouldn't result in more than a miniscule amount of air
leakage. More importantly, I took action to seal wasteful air leakage
paths which rob cooling air from the all-critical cylinder heads.
Several years ago, I asked Lycoming what the
optimal CHT is and they simply said "the lower, the better". I estimate 320
degrees to be about the lowest obtainable, considering the size of our
air inlets. That's probably more than sufficient for the long term health
of the engine and attempts to go any lower would unproductively increase
cooling drag.
Yes, I'll be glad to measure upper plenum
pressures, let me know the procedure/equipment off list.
 
Respectfully,
 
Bill Rumburg
N403WR (Sonic bOOm)
 
----- Original Message -----
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net (Lancair Mailing List)

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:45 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Cooler CHTs

Bill,
Is
that a new engine? -looks spotless.
Scott
Krueger was also able to get a really good seal on his baffles.  In fact,
he had the highest measured pressure recovery I have seen using flexible
baffle material.  You wouldn't happen to have (or be interested in
measuring) some upper plenum pressures for comparison?  -forever in
search of cooling system data.
How do you interface to the
inlets? -any pics of that area?
thanks,
Chris
Zavatson
N91CZ
360std