L360 static ports

Forums: 

From: Stevens Family <stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: L360 static ports
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:09:24 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

A question for those who have gone before me. I am just getting to the stage of planning my static system. I plan on putting in two static ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as suggested in the  manual. The recommended position is about half way along the sides of the baggage area. They suggest  using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded into the honeycomb of the side panel. This would protrude what looks to be about an inch into the baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing then attaches to the fitting, which will result in the whole connection protruding at least 2” into the baggage area.

 

Whilst I am sure this will work well as far as the static system is concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before an errant piece of baggage being placed into the baggage area will land on the protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting.

 

What have others done about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N elbow fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from the specifications that this will work.

 

I am interested in what others have done.

 

Thanks for help.

 

Regards,

 

Rob Stevens

Perth, Western Australia.

 

L360 static ports

From: David Powell <superdmp [at] sonic.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] L360 static ports
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 09:02:21 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
In the 360 that I purchased, I believe the
builder put some kind of protective box (wood by the feel of it) around the
sensitive areas. I’m not certain, but it appears he also ran some other lines or
wires through the area because the boxed areas seem bigger than necessary for
just the static system.
 
Hope that helps,
Dave
 
 
From: stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au (Stevens Family)

Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 4:09 AM
To: lml [at] lancaironline.net (Lancair Mailing List)

Subject: [LML] L360 static ports
 

A question for those who have gone before me. I am just
getting to the stage of planning my static system. I plan on putting in two
static ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as suggested in the 
manual. The recommended position is about half way along the sides of the
baggage area. They suggest  using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded
into the honeycomb of the side panel. This would protrude what looks to be about
an inch into the baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing then attaches to the
fitting, which will result in the whole connection protruding at least 2” into
the baggage area.

 

Whilst I am sure this will work well as far as the static
system is concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before
an errant piece of baggage being placed into the baggage area will land on the
protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting.

 

What have others done about this? I thought of using a
Nylo-seal 269N elbow fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from the
specifications that this will work.

 

I am interested in what others have done.

 

Thanks for help.

 

Regards,

 

Rob Stevens

Perth, Western Australia.

 

 

L360 static ports

From: Tim Jørgensen <tj [at] yacht-pool.dk>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] L360 static ports
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 09:03:23 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Here´s what I did:
 
I bought a couple of expensive 90 deg. static port
inserts and ground them down, so they were actually just a 90 deg. metal
channel, ending in a hose fitting. I could have saved a lot of time and $ if I
had just bought two AN842 elbows, but I was not that clever back
then.
 
 
 
Here you see the positions marked on the inside of
the fuselage. I removed the core material around the positions and, probably,
covered with 2 BID.
 
Then I drilled a 1 mm. or so hole, inserted a loose
oiled drill bit from the outside, hung the ground down static port (AN842
elbow) on the drill bit, secured it with a dab of instant glue and
finally
locked it in place with flox and, maybe, one BID,
leaving the hose fitting free, of course.
 
 
 
I had carefully planned my fish bone interior to
match the static ports, so that they, and the static line, would be covered by
one of the "bones".
The matrix for the "bones" is fabricated on the
fuselage and is made of 2 or 3 BID on release tape. The "bone" that houses the
static line is covered with 1/4"
white foam on the front, nicely rounded and covered
with 1 BID. The rest of the "bones" are covered with 1/4" soft foam padding and
everything is wrapped in
blue alcantara. I then carved a channel for the
static line from the backside. The static line runs down into the cable channel
below (see first photo), that consists of
the coreless area with a 2 BID cover over
it.
 
 
This is what it looks like when finished. First a
layer of 1/4" soft foam is glued to the fuselage. Grey alcantara glued on top of
that.
Channels carefully cut where the blue matrix is to
be fixed to the fuselage. Velcro part 1, maybe 5/8" strips, glued to fuselage in
those channels,
velcro part 2 glued to blue matrix.
 
 
Same procedure for the headliner. You can see the
static line on the LH fuselage side (RH side of the photo if viewed from
Australia).
 
I did the side panels for the seating area slightly
different, mainly because of the rudder cables and stub wing
opening.
 
 
 
I first fabricated a flat 2 BID panel on the table.
I then cut it to shape and double curved it, which was a bit of a pain. I had to
make several cuts
from the outside towards the middle of the panel,
fix it to the fuselage with hot glue and cover the cuts with 2 bid, in order
to produce a shape that
fit the fuselage nicely. I then covered the panels
with soft foam and grey alcantara and then velcro-installed the blue "bone"
matrix, that I had pre-made directly on the panels.
This way I have two loose panels (yes, installed
with velcro) that also close the stub wing opening.
The foot wells and nose gear well are just covered
with some helicopter padding that is cut to shape and folded over and sewn at
the edges.
 
IMPORTANT:
"Bone" matrixes and window frames must be
fabricated on release tape in the exact spot they will be installed!!! It
is NOT possible to just make
a flat piece of 2 BID, cut it to shape and install
it with velcro. All surfaces are double curved.
 
 
All in all, I think it is a nice result. It is
rather time consuming, though, but it is good fun, lightweight and inexpensive.
No sewing required, this is a job you can do, and do nicely,
without involving professionals.
 
Regards
Tim Jorgensen
Denmark
360MKIIOBFB / 100%, waiting another week or so for
the flight permit.
 
 
 
 


Image


1.jpg


Image


2.jpg


Image


3.jpg


Image


4.jpg


Image


5.jpg

L360 static ports

From: <marv [at] lancair.net>
Subject: Re: L360 static ports
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 10:08:18 -0400
To: <lml>

Posted for "Jim Nordin"
<panelmaker [at] earthlink.net>:

> Hey Rob,
>
> Well, what I did is first buy the static ports
>
<http://www.aircraftspruce.com/menus/in/staticports.html>  offered by
> Aircraft Spruce or build your own then install as the
plans call for.
>
> Then I took a 1” OD (or so) rounded end wooden dowel about 3” long, put it
> inside a balloon (for release) and
glassed half of it. That is I glassed the
> full length and let the wet glass droop down the sides/ends. After set, cut
> it so it looks
like a boat. Epoxy that over the hole where the bottom of the
> “boat” is just below the static port hole. Make the boat at about a 45º
>
angle as the picture shows. After cure, make a hole at the bottom of the
> “boat” the size of your nyloflow and push the nyloflow up into the
boat as
> far as it will go. Glass it in.
> OK … now you have a self draining port that is not quite flush (1/2” or so)
> with the
inside wall of the fuselage. Run the nyloflow however you want.
> Make sense?
> Jim
>
>
>

>  _____  
>
>From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net]">mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
> Stevens
Family
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 6:09 AM
> To: Lancair Mailing List
> Subject: [LML] L360 static ports
>
>

>
> A question for those who have gone before me. I am just getting to the stage
> of planning my static system. I plan on putting
in two static ports, one on
> either side of the fuselage, as suggested in the  manual. The recommended
> position is about half
way along the sides of the baggage area. They suggest
> using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded into the honeycomb of the side
>
panel. This would protrude what looks to be about an inch into the baggage
> area. The Nylo-seal tubing then attaches to the fitting, which will
result
> in the whole connection protruding at least 2” into the baggage area.
>
>
>
> Whilst I am sure this will
work well as far as the static system is
> concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before an
> errant piece of
baggage being placed into the baggage area will land on the
> protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting.
>
>

>
> What have others done about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N elbow
> fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!)
from the specifications that
> this will work.
>
>
>
> I am interested in what others have done.
>
>

>
> Thanks for help.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Rob Stevens
>
> Perth,
Western Australia.
>
>
>

L360 static ports

From: Chris Zavatson <chris_zavatson [at] yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] L360 static ports
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 10:45:32 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
Rob,
I bonded a 90 degree AN fitting into the fuselage skin.  The attached hard line then sits flush against the inside of the fuselage. 
Also, I found that two ports were not needed so flew for the first 12 years on one.  I added a second port for the autopilot.  Mechanical VSIs generate some flow in the static line which the auto pilot will interpret as a small pressure difference until the VSI reaches equilibrium.


Chris Zavatson
N91CZ
360std


On Friday, August 15, 2014 4:09 AM, Stevens Family <stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au> wrote:




A question for those who have gone before me. I am just getting to the stage of planning my static system. I plan on putting in two static ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as suggested in the  manual. The recommended position is about half way along the sides of the baggage area. They suggest  using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded into the honeycomb of the side panel. This would protrude what looks to be about an inch into the baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing then attaches to the fitting, which will result in the whole connection protruding at least 2” into the baggage area.
 
Whilst I am sure this will work well as far as the static system is concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before an errant piece of baggage being
placed into the baggage area will land on the protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting.
 
What have others done about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N elbow fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from the specifications that this will work.
 
I am interested in what others have done.
 
Thanks for help.
 
Regards,
 
Rob Stevens
Perth, Western Australia.
 



L360 static ports

From: <marv [at] lancair.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] L360 static ports
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 10:47:56 -0400
To: <lml>


Posted for "Bill Bradburry"
<bbradburry [at] verizon.net>:


Rob,

 

Two of these static ports came with my Legacy kit.

 

http://shop.lancair.com/inventoryD.asp?item_no=4937&CatId={BA344909-613F-4C45-A718-0DB8D27FF50F}

 

They require a quarter inch hole in the
fuselage and they are just proud of flush with the exterior and maybe a half inch into the interior of the baggage area.  I floxed them in. 
I thought that I might have to do something to the exterior to affect the accuracy, but a four direction speed test shows that my airspeed is within
one knot of the gps.

 

Bill

 




From: 
Lancair Mailing
List
 [lml [at] lancaironline.net
]">mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.netOn Behalf Of Stevens Family
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014
6:09 AM
To: 
Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] L360 static
ports

 

A question for those who have gone before me. I am
just getting to the stage of planning my static system. I plan on putting in two static ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as suggested in
the  manual. The recommended position is about half way along the sides of the baggage area. They suggest  using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N
fitting bonded into the honeycomb of the side panel. This would protrude what looks to be about an inch into the baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing
then attaches to the fitting, which will result in the whole connection protruding at least 2” into the baggage area.

 

Whilst I am sure this
will work well as far as the static system is concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before an errant piece of baggage being
placed into the baggage area will land on the protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting.

 

What have others done
about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N elbow fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from the specifications that this will
work.

 

I am interested in what others have done.

 

Thanks for help.

 

Regards,

 

Rob
Stevens


PerthWestern Australia.

 

L360 static ports

From: John Cooper <snopercod [at] comporium.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: L360 static ports
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 17:27:21 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

On the 235, the static ports are located behind the baggage
bulkhead and a couple inches below the longeron. I just bonded in
the nylon fitting recommended in the plans. The nylon tubing slopes
upward from the ports to the tee in the center so as to drain out
any water that might get in the ports. I haven't flown yet so I
don't know how my static system will perform. I do know that
Clarence Grubbs, whose static port location was identical to mine,
had to bond little a vertical wire in front of each port to get his
cruise speed calibrated.



Port is in the lower right of this photo:



/files/LML/70568-02-01-R/part1.07050609.01020302 [at] comporium.net" sandbox="" width="192" height="124">


Image


static port.jpg

L360 static ports

From: Charles Brown <browncc1 [at] verizon.net>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: L360 static ports
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:20:54 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
On my Legacy I floxed in the same part that Bill did.  It's very low profile, and the Legacy has a recessed channel along the left and right sides of the baggage bay for cables and static lines.  In my case, I made the port perfectly flush with the external fuselage skin.  I haven't rigorously tested the IAS or TAS.  In spite of the hump in the tube, it still gets water occasionally.  
My cabin interior has removable upholstery sections that cover the wire tunnels.  They pretty much make everything disappear.




Posted for "Bill Bradburry"
<bbradburry [at] verizon.net

>:

Rob,

Two of these static ports came with my Legacy kit.
They require a quarter inch hole in the
fuselage and they are just proud of flush with the exterior and maybe a half inch into the interior of the baggage area.  I floxed them in. 
I thought that I might have to do something to the exterior to affect the accuracy, but a four direction speed test shows that my airspeed is within
one knot of the gps.
Bill
 




Image


Screen shot 2014-08-16 at 6.23.30 AM.png


Image


PastedGraphic-1.png

L360 static ports

From: Stevens Family <stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: L360 static ports
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:21:23 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Tim,

 

That’s a very impressive upholstery job! I’m not sure I have the time for something so ambitious though. And I like the way you have used the features on the sidelining to hide things.

 

Thanks for taking the time to put it up for everyone to see.

 

As for the plumbing to the static ports, did you use clear plastic tubing or nylo-seal tubing?

 

 

Regards

Rob Stevens.

 

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net]">mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Tim Jørgensen
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2014 9:03 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: L360 static ports

 

Here´s what I did:

 

I bought a couple of expensive 90 deg. static port inserts and ground them down, so they were actually just a 90 deg. metal channel, ending in a hose fitting. I could have saved a lot of time and $ if I had just bought two AN842 elbows, but I was not that clever back then.

 

 

 

Here you see the positions marked on the inside of the fuselage. I removed the core material around the positions and, probably, covered with 2 BID.

 

Then I drilled a 1 mm. or so hole, inserted a loose oiled drill bit from the outside, hung the ground down static port (AN842 elbow) on the drill bit, secured it with a dab of instant glue and finally

locked it in place with flox and, maybe, one BID, leaving the hose fitting free, of course.

 

 

 

I had carefully planned my fish bone interior to match the static ports, so that they, and the static line, would be covered by one of the "bones".

The matrix for the "bones" is fabricated on the fuselage and is made of 2 or 3 BID on release tape. The "bone" that houses the static line is covered with 1/4"

white foam on the front, nicely rounded and covered with 1 BID. The rest of the "bones" are covered with 1/4" soft foam padding and everything is wrapped in

blue alcantara. I then carved a channel for the static line from the backside. The static line runs down into the cable channel below (see first photo), that consists of

the coreless area with a 2 BID cover over it.

 

 

This is what it looks like when finished. First a layer of 1/4" soft foam is glued to the fuselage. Grey alcantara glued on top of that.

Channels carefully cut where the blue matrix is to be fixed to the fuselage. Velcro part 1, maybe 5/8" strips, glued to fuselage in those channels,

velcro part 2 glued to blue matrix.

 

 

Same procedure for the headliner. You can see the static line on the LH fuselage side (RH side of the photo if viewed from Australia).

 

I did the side panels for the seating area slightly different, mainly because of the rudder cables and stub wing opening.

 

 

 

I first fabricated a flat 2 BID panel on the table. I then cut it to shape and double curved it, which was a bit of a pain. I had to make several cuts

from the outside towards the middle of the panel, fix it to the fuselage with hot glue and cover the cuts with 2 bid, in order to produce a shape that

fit the fuselage nicely. I then covered the panels with soft foam and grey alcantara and then velcro-installed the blue "bone" matrix, that I had pre-made directly on the panels.

This way I have two loose panels (yes, installed with velcro) that also close the stub wing opening.

The foot wells and nose gear well are just covered with some helicopter padding that is cut to shape and folded over and sewn at the edges.

 

IMPORTANT:

"Bone" matrixes and window frames must be fabricated on release tape in the exact spot they will be installed!!! It is NOT possible to just make

a flat piece of 2 BID, cut it to shape and install it with velcro. All surfaces are double curved.

 

 

All in all, I think it is a nice result. It is rather time consuming, though, but it is good fun, lightweight and inexpensive. No sewing required, this is a job you can do, and do nicely,

without involving professionals.

 

Regards

Tim Jorgensen

Denmark

360MKIIOBFB / 100%, waiting another week or so for the flight permit.

 

 

 

 


Image


image001.jpg


Image


image002.jpg


Image


image003.jpg


Image


image004.jpg


Image


image005.jpg

L360 static ports

From: Stevens Family <stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: L360 static ports
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:21:48 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Thanks Dave. It’s because I don’t want a big box down both sides of the baggage area that I asked the question.

 

Thanks for responding.

 

Rob.

 

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net]">mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of David Powell
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2014 9:02 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: L360 static ports

 

In the 360 that I purchased, I believe the builder put some kind of protective box (wood by the feel of it) around the sensitive areas. I’m not certain, but it appears he also ran some other lines or wires through the area because the boxed areas seem bigger than necessary for just the static system.

 

Hope that helps,

Dave

 

 

From: stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au (Stevens Family)

Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 4:09 AM

To: lml [at] lancaironline.net (Lancair Mailing List)

Subject: [LML] L360 static ports

 

A question for those who have gone before me. I am just getting to the stage of planning my static system. I plan on putting in two static ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as suggested in the  manual. The recommended position is about half way along the sides of the baggage area. They suggest  using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded into the honeycomb of the side panel. This would protrude what looks to be about an inch into the baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing then attaches to the fitting, which will result in the whole connection protruding at least 2” into the baggage area.

 

Whilst I am sure this will work well as far as the static system is concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before an errant piece of baggage being placed into the baggage area will land on the protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting.

 

What have others done about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N elbow fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from the specifications that this will work.

 

I am interested in what others have done.

 

Thanks for help.

 

Regards,

 

Rob Stevens

Perth, Western Australia.

 

 

L360 static ports

From: Stevens Family <stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: L360 static ports
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:21:57 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Jim,

 

Thanks. That’s a novel solution. I’ll put it in the mix as I make my decision.

 

Rob.

 

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net]">mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of marv [at] lancair.net
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2014 10:08 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: L360 static ports

 


Posted for "Jim Nordin" <panelmaker [at] earthlink.net

>:

> Hey Rob,
>
> Well, what I did is first buy the static ports
> <http://www.aircraftspruce.com/menus/in/staticports.html>  offered by
> Aircraft Spruce or build your own then install as the plans call for.
>
> Then I took a 1” OD (or so) rounded end wooden dowel about 3” long, put it
> inside a balloon (for release) and glassed half of it. That is I glassed the
> full length and let the wet glass droop down the sides/ends. After set, cut
> it so it looks like a boat. Epoxy that over the hole where the bottom of the
> “boat” is just below the static port hole. Make the boat at about a 45º
> angle as the picture shows. After cure, make a hole at the bottom of the
> “boat” the size of your nyloflow and push the nyloflow up into the boat as
> far as it will go. Glass it in.
> OK … now you have a self draining port that is not quite flush (1/2” or so)
> with the inside wall of the fuselage. Run the nyloflow however you want.
> Make sense?
> Jim
>
>
>
>  _____  
>
>From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

] On Behalf Of
> Stevens Family
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 6:09 AM
> To: Lancair Mailing List
> Subject: [LML] L360 static ports
>
>
>
> A question for those who have gone before me. I am just getting to the stage
> of planning my static system. I plan on putting in two static ports, one on
> either side of the fuselage, as suggested in the  manual. The recommended
> position is about half way along the sides of the baggage area. They suggest
> using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded into the honeycomb of the side
> panel. This would protrude what looks to be about an inch into the baggage
> area. The Nylo-seal tubing then attaches to the fitting, which will result
> in the whole connection protruding at least 2” into the baggage area.
>
>
>
> Whilst I am sure this will work well as far as the static system is
> concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before an
> errant piece of baggage being placed into the baggage area will land on the
> protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting.
>
>
>
> What have others done about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N elbow
> fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from the specifications that
> this will work.
>
>
>
> I am interested in what others have done.
>
>
>
> Thanks for help.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Rob Stevens
>
> Perth, Western Australia.
>
>
>

L360 static ports

From: Stevens Family <stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: L360 static ports
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:22:06 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Chris,

 

I like the idea of the 90Deg AN fitting, and that it keeps the line flush with the side of the fuselage. Did you run hard line ( I presume you mean ¼” 5052 Al line) all the way to the panel, of did you change to nylo-seal at some point? If so, how did you join them together?

 

Thanks for your comment reference the static ports. I am intending to operate my aircraft IFR, and will therefore need a pair of “balanced static ports” according to my research of our Australian rules. Not sure if that applies in the USA.

 

Rob.

 

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net]">mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Chris Zavatson
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2014 10:46 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: L360 static ports

 

Rob,

I bonded a 90 degree AN fitting into the fuselage skin.  The attached hard line then sits flush against the inside of the fuselage. 

Also, I found that two ports were not needed so flew for the first 12 years on one.  I added a second port for the autopilot.  Mechanical VSIs generate some flow in the static line which the auto pilot will interpret as a small pressure difference until the VSI reaches equilibrium.

 

Chris Zavatson

N91CZ

360std

 

On Friday, August 15, 2014 4:09 AM, Stevens Family <stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au

> wrote:

 

A question for those who have gone before me. I am just getting to the stage of planning my static system. I plan on putting in two static ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as suggested in the  manual. The recommended position is about half way along the sides of the baggage area. They suggest  using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded into the honeycomb of the side panel. This would protrude what looks to be about an inch into the baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing then attaches to the fitting, which will result in the whole connection protruding at least 2” into the baggage area.

 

Whilst I am sure this will work well as far as the static system is concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before an errant piece of baggage being placed into the baggage area will land on the protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting.

 

What have others done about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N elbow fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from the specifications that this will work.

 

I am interested in what others have done.

 

Thanks for help.

 

Regards,

 

Rob Stevens

Perth, Western Australia.

 

 

L360 static ports

From: Stevens Family <stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: L360 static ports
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:22:17 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Thanks Bill. Another good solution. I wasn’t aware of these.

 

Rob.

 

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net]">mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of marv [at] lancair.net
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2014 10:48 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: L360 static ports

 


Posted for "Bill Bradburry" <bbradburry [at] verizon.net

>:

 

Rob,

 

Two of these static ports came with my Legacy kit.

 

http://shop.lancair.com/inventoryD.asp?item_no=4937&CatId={BA344909-613F-4C45-A718-0DB8D27FF50F}

 

They require a quarter inch hole in the fuselage and they are just proud of flush with the exterior and maybe a half inch into the interior of the baggage area.  I floxed them in.  I thought that I might have to do something to the exterior to affect the accuracy, but a four direction speed test shows that my airspeed is within one knot of the gps.

 

Bill

 


From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net (mailto:)

On Behalf Of Stevens Family
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 6:09 AM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] L360 static ports

 

A question for those who have gone before me. I am just getting to the stage of planning my static system. I plan on putting in two static ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as suggested in the  manual. The recommended position is about half way along the sides of the baggage area. They suggest  using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded into the honeycomb of the side panel. This would protrude what looks to be about an inch into the baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing then attaches to the fitting, which will result in the whole connection protruding at least 2” into the baggage area.

 

Whilst I am sure this will work well as far as the static system is concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before an errant piece of baggage being placed into the baggage area will land on the protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting.

 

What have others done about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N elbow fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from the specifications that this will work.

 

I am interested in what others have done.

 

Thanks for help.

 

Regards,

 

Rob Stevens

Perth, Western Australia.

 

--

 

For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

L360 static ports

From: Stevens Family <stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: L360 static ports
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:22:44 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Thanks John. Yes, if it was behind the baggage bulkhead I wouldn’t have a problem. With the Nylo-seal fitting recommended in the manual.

 

By the way, the nico-press sleeves arrive OK. Thanks.

 

Rob.

 

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [lml [at] lancaironline.net]">mailto:lml [at] lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of John Cooper
Sent: Saturday, 16 August 2014 5:27 AM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: L360 static ports

 

On the 235, the static ports are located behind the baggage bulkhead and a couple inches below the longeron. I just bonded in the nylon fitting recommended in the plans. The nylon tubing slopes upward from the ports to the tee in the center so as to drain out any water that might get in the ports. I haven't flown yet so I don't know how my static system will perform. I do know that Clarence Grubbs, whose static port location was identical to mine, had to bond little a vertical wire in front of each port to get his cruise speed calibrated.

Port is in the lower right of this photo:


Image


image001.jpg

L360 static ports

From: Christian Meier <lancair [at] meier.cc>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] L360 static ports
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:23:21 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>

Rob,


the nylo-seal elbow fitting works fine.
Make sure you route the tubing as seen on my picture, so no water will enter the lines!
To protect the fitting, put some micro around and cover with 1 bid of glass.

Christian


Am 15.08.2014 um 13:09 schrieb Stevens Family <stevens5 [at] swiftdsl.com.au

>:



A question for those who have gone before me. I am just getting to the stage of planning my static system. I plan on putting in two static ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as suggested in the  manual. The recommended position is about half way along the sides of the baggage area. They suggest  using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded into the honeycomb of the side panel. This would protrude what looks to be about an inch into the baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing then attaches to the fitting, which will result in the whole connection protruding at least 2” into the baggage area.

 

Whilst I am sure this will work well as far as the static system is concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before an errant piece of baggage being placed into the baggage area will land on the protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting.

 

What have others done about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N elbow fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from the specifications that this will work.

 

I am interested in what others have done.

 

Thanks for help.

 

Regards,

 

Rob Stevens
Perth, Western Australia.


L360 static ports

From: bob mackey <n103md [at] yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv [at] lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] L360 static ports
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:16:37 -0400
To: <lml [at] lancaironline.net>
> ...but a four direction speed test shows that my airspeed is within one knot of the gps.

This is a common misconception. Airspeed tests do not show that the static port is
free of error. It only shows that the static port and pitot port have the same pressure errors at the tested airspeed.

To test static port accuracy, you need to fly different airspeeds at the same known altitude and check for any variation.
I used the horizontal roofline of the tower at my local airport as the altitude reference and flew successive laps of the landing pattern at speeds ranging from 60 kias to 200 kias. The faster I flew, the higher the indicated altitude (+300' at 200 kias initially). The errors were parabolic (depending on the square of the speed) as expected. Based on that
information, I was able to reposition the static port until the altitude error was reduced to about 30 feet over the usual speed range. 

I am using a Piper style combined pitot-static blade on the bottom of the wing. The adjustment that I made was to remachine the end of the blade to a different angle to make it more forward-facing.

After the static port is calibrated, THEN check the
pitot pressure by comparison of ASI with GPS speed.
 

bob mackey